MPWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 36.89%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 69.91% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $754.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.92%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $238.54 which suggests that it could grow by 14.81%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than Broadcom.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.6%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Broadcom offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $637.6M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $133.8M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.99x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 99.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 13.03x versus 18.22x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 11.02%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 69.91% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $754.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.92%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $103.36 which suggests that it could grow by 79.35%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.826, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.607%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $637.6M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $133.8M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.99x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 13.03x versus 8.65x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 56.17%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 69.91% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $754.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.92%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $163.12 which suggests that it could grow by 38.98%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.31%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $637.6M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $133.8M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.99x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 39.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 13.03x versus 22.31x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Instruments has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 28.98%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 69.91% beat Texas Instruments's return on equity of 28.74%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $754.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.92%. On the other hand Texas Instruments has an analysts' consensus of $177.42 which suggests that it could grow by 7.11%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than Texas Instruments, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than Texas Instruments.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Instruments has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.158%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Texas Instruments offers a yield of 3.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Instruments pays out 99.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $637.6M, which are smaller than Texas Instruments quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $133.8M is lower than Texas Instruments's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.99x while Texas Instruments's PE ratio is 31.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 13.03x versus 9.48x for Texas Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.